Intro to Paralegal Studies Practice

What role does causation play in proving negligence?

1. It indicates the defendant was aware of the actions

2. It shows a direct link between breach and harm

3. It implies that the harm was anticipated

4. It establishes the legality of the act

The correct answer is: It shows a direct link between breach and harm

Causation is a crucial element in proving negligence, as it demonstrates a clear, direct link between the defendant's breach of duty and the resulting harm experienced by the plaintiff. In the context of negligence, causation requires showing that the defendant's actions—or inactions—were a significant factor that led to the plaintiff's injury. This direct connection is often divided into two parts: "cause in fact," which establishes that the injury would not have occurred but for the defendant's breach, and "proximate cause," which assesses whether the harm was a foreseeable result of the defendant's actions. By proving this link, a plaintiff can establish that the defendant's failure to meet the required standard of care resulted in actual harm, making causation a decisive factor in a successful negligence claim. Understanding this relationship is essential for paralegals and legal professionals when navigating personal injury cases and other tort actions.